Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Maps of the 2008 US Presidential Election by Mark Newman
Red = Rep
Blue = Dem
Electoral Map by State

Electoral Map by State using a population cartogram.

Electoral Map by County

Electoral Map by County cartogram by population
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Smaller Government
If we had less taxes and less debt, then we wouldn't be in this mess.
Why can't we leave it to the people to take care of each other? Do we really have so little faith in each other? Oh. You're right... without the government everyone would starve. All of these NGO's and non-profit organizations do nothing. People never donate, volunteer, serve or give.
Oh Government, come save us from ourselves please.
I don't understand...
- Doubling the production of alternative energy in the next three years. - It seems like our economy would boost with cheaper energy. I just hope that 'alternative energy' will make the cost go down and not up. I also hope there's a combination of alternative, with us drilling to have more in general and helping us as we become less dependent on foreign oil sources.
- Modernizing more than 75% of federal buildings and improve the energy efficiency of two million American homes, saving consumers and taxpayers billions on our energy bills. I think reconstruction can wait until after the recession, I don't see how a new AC is going to help the economy. Maybe they're confusing economy with climate?
- Making the immediate investments necessary to ensure that within five years, all of America’s medical records are computerized. I really don't see how THIS helps the economy.
- Equipping tens of thousands of schools, community colleges, and public universities with 21st century classrooms, labs, and libraries. This is great too, but still not seeing the correlation to the economy.
- Expanding broadband across America, so that a small business in a rural town can connect and compete with their counterparts anywhere in the world. How can they compete with no job? Since this is an "economic plan" maybe we should talk about how to FORM those jobs?
- Investing in the science, research, and technology that will lead to new medical breakthroughs, new discoveries, and entire new industries. This is a big one, and new discoveries could lead to new jobs... but how much are you investing? Are you investing in the public sector, where it will actually help people's jobs... or just give more money to government organizations?
Monday, January 26, 2009
This stimulus bill is nothing but the permanent implementation of the pet projects of the House and Senate
http://blog.heritage.org/2009/01/26/morning-bell-a-conservative-alternative-to-obamas-permanent-spending-plan/
Friday, January 23, 2009
Papa Government teaches us that debt ROCKS!
Our Crisis: Our crisis began with the Papa Government getting too happy about giving everyone what they want. Papa Government said, “hey American constituent kiddos, be easier on people by giving them loans when they can’t pay their rent, and just crashed their car”.
What led us to our crisis?
Papa Government didn’t let his little kiddos live their own lives and make their own mistakes. It’s not Papa Governments responsibility to give the constituents everything they want… just to make sure they don’t kill each other.
Our lives are based on thinking we can have everything we want, even though we don’t deserve it, and yes I said deserve it. Cringe if you will, but what makes you think you deserve to have a house, if you can’t even make your rent payment each month?
We’re headed into an even bigger crisis, by doing exactly what got us into this mess. Credit. Instead of taxing us, the new administration and even our senators want to tack on more to our deficit (crediting).
Dear American constituent kiddos,
We will not be raising taxes (this is where everyone stops reading and throws away the letter), however… you owe us 1.31 trillion If Congress passes an $800 billion, two-year stimulus bill.
Good luck!
With Love,
Papa Government.
In my eyes: Adding to the deficit is the same as raising our taxes.
Thursday, January 22, 2009
HEADLINE NEWS: paying taxes isn't a big deal
Republican Jim Bunning of Kentucky told Geithner his failure to pay the taxes fully until just before his selection by Obama was announced was "hard to explain to my constituents who pay these taxes on a regular basis."
Grassley said he recognizes that many in Congress view Geithner, who worked closely with the outgoing administration on Wall Street's meltdown as head of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, as "possibly the only man for the job of healing the recession before us and a very fractured economy."http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090121/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/treasury_geithner
Geithner's our new Treasury Secretary, unfortunately he didn't know how to pay his taxes for a few years, helped with our current economic crisis and is going to lead us into an even darker red hole of debt. If you haven't already heard the Senate Confirmation hearing for Tim Geithner, take a looksy below.
If you listen around the 40 second mark, you'll learn Geithner's been helping out with our current downfall: http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=1007899019
start at the 1 minute mark: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VY2TNV5X8aM&eurl=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video_log/2009/01/geithner_faces_questions_from.htmlMy thoughts: They couldn't think of someone else that could do this job? Sad. I can think of a few Republicans, but you're right... not many democrats.
Your Opinion?
only $120 million
Headlines On This Date 4 Years Ago:
“Republicans spending $42 million on inauguration while troops Die in unarmored Humvees"
Headlines Today:
"Historic Obama Inauguration will cost only $120 million"
"Obama Spends $120 million on inauguration; America Needs A Big Party"
"It also highlighted the type of news you can generate when making blatantly false comparisons. In this case, it was the cost of the Obama and Bush inaugurations. The connection was unfair because the Obama figure of $160 million that got repeated in the press included security costs associated with the massive event. But the Bush tab of $42 million left out those enormous costs. Talk about stacking the deck.
The misinformation first arrived in the form of an underreported newspaper article in America, and then one in London. Between them, and thanks to furious transatlantic online linking, the reports gave birth to the story that Obama's inauguration was going to cost nearly four times what the country spent on Bush's bash in 2005 -- that the Obama inauguration would cost almost $120 million more."
